![]() |
KnowBrainer Speech Recognition | ![]() |
Topic Title: Auto-Formatting Is Still Broke. Topic Summary: This is the same whether using DPG or DPI 15.61 Created On: 12/17/2020 03:09 PM Status: Post and Reply |
|
![]() |
![]() |
- Tiger Feet | - 12/17/2020 03:09 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Lunis Orcutt | - 12/17/2020 09:14 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Stephan Kuepper | - 12/18/2020 04:09 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Mav | - 12/18/2020 07:32 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Matt_Chambers | - 12/18/2020 09:17 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Tiger Feet | - 12/18/2020 09:19 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
- bmac | - 12/18/2020 09:27 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Tiger Feet | - 12/18/2020 11:42 AM |
![]() |
|
Although I am using DPG 15.61, the results should be the same when using DPI 15.61. If I set my Auto-Formatting to ‘Numbers, if greater than or equal to 0’ then this is what I get when dictating the following. ------------------------- Tiger Feet |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
If your Auto-Formatting Options look the same as ours, you shouldn't have this issue. Your user profile either has a wrong setting or is slightly corrupted. There is probably a real solution but the sledgehammer approach is likelier simpler. Try creating a new profile and then import your current user vocabulary and commands. Note that in this situation, you should be able to use the DragonBar Manage Vocabularies\Export feature which will preserve your training, specialty vocabulary and even your deleted words.
------------------------- Forum Mission Statement |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Sorry but
"I want it one time only" "I want it to times only" "I want it free times only" "I want it for times only" are misrecognitions, not auto-formatting hiccups. Auto-formatting handles whether a number is spelled out as a word or as a numeral. If Dragon doesn't properly recognise the number as such, no auto-formatting rule will ever kick in. A new user profile is probably the best option but as I just wrote in another post, don't export your vocabulary, but only your custom words, preferably in XML format. The vocabulary is your hotel room, the custom words your suitcase. You don't take the whole room with you if you move, especially if you move because the window is broken. Hope that helps, Stephan ------------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Nice analogy +1 from me
mav |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
At least two of these are funny misrecognitions, however, due to homophones. Dragon ought to know better than to think you probably want to say "I want it to times only" or "I want it for times only".
Acoustically, these misrecognitions are dead accurate, but Dragon is doing a poor job of applying the language model. This is one of my pet peeves with version 15. Although its accuracy is very high, it makes a fair number of mistakes like this where it puts together words that really shouldn't show up in combination in any decent language model. As some of us have discussed here before, it seems that version 15 overweights the acoustic model and underweights the language model. I wonder if moving the speed versus accuracy slider to the right results in greater weighting of the language model. Put another way, be sure to ask at the front desk if your room is next to an elevator. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Yes, I know I can say, numeral before a number but I shouldn't have to. Okay, so I tried: I counted one item I counted 2 items I counted 3 items I counted 4 items Using your context, 3 of them corrected themselves but the 1st 1 did not. I tried it 3 times but I am still getting; I counted one item, I counted one item. I counted one item I counted one item. Using your context. So I suppose the next thing I should try as suggested by Stephan is to export my custom words and phrases in XML format, then reimport them? Do I need to go through the words and phrases first and take out any erroneous spellings? Cheers ------------------------- Tiger Feet |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
I have always wondered why Nuance would choose to allow the user to allow number formatting "if greater than or equal to 2". The "2" allows for 2 many missed recognitions (as has been just documented with my dictation here). Why not just simply start with 3 or greater?
------------------------- Bill |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
I shall have to do some fiddling about and see what happens. As I say it is not the end of the world. Just a niggling PIA. ------------------------- Tiger Feet |
|
|
FuseTalk Standard Edition v4.0 - © 1999-2021 FuseTalk™ Inc. All rights reserved.