Microsoft is legally obligated to make the Windows OS and other applications as speech recognition friendly as possible. It is unlikely that hands-free technology would take a hit and more likely that it will be further developed. WSR was already on the Microsoft chopping block. We wouldn't be surprised the Dragon Home Edition took its place.

Change "No" to "Know" w/KnowBrainer 2022
Trial Downloads
Dragon/Sales@KnowBrainer.com 
(615) 884-4558 ex 1

Q: What is the legal obligation? Generic ADA (Americans with Disability Act)?  Or was there some specific lawsuit settlement?

Why isn't Google under that same obligation?  :-(   Or do they believe that they are as completely speech recognition friendly as possible  already?

It often seems to me that when a company gets big enough  they are subject to an ADA or similar lawsuit, and hence have to be more accessible.

And that often a new, smaller, start  up rival is less accessible, and probably hence faster at coding other features,  helping them catch up to the big guy,  who has been slow down by their accessibility obligations.

Ditto internationalization,  although AFAIK internationalization is seldom a legal requirement. Multilingual support the sometimes is, especially in companies or trade areas that have multiple languages. And  implementations for internationalization/multilingual  port are extremely standardized. Accessibility  is less standardized, especially as new devices with new interfaces  are invented.  

DPG15.6 (also DPI 15.3) + KB, Sennheiser MB Pro 1 UC ML, BTD 800 dongle, Windows 10 Pro, MS Surface Book 3, Intel Core i7-1065G7 CPU @ 1.3/1.5GHz (4 cores, 8 logical, GPU=NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design.